This election has literally become very negative. The winners will be determined by which "anti-" sentiment gets the most people out to vote. Voters fall into one of the two Anti movement groups: the Anti-Washington group and the Anti-American group.
The anti-Washington movement is fueled by anti-government sentiment.
The Anti-Washington group is essentially against the Democrats. They are the party in power, so they are the party that is blamed for the problems that we are facing as a nation right now, as well as some problems that are entirely made up by or for the media's consumption. The Democrats are in charge, so therefore they are the "Washington insiders" who have either succeeded or failed, depending on which media narrative you are following.
The Anti-America group manifests itself as the Republican Tea Party. They are so determined to have Obama fail that they are willing to have America fail to do it. They want to take Obama down by taking America down.
The Republican Tea Partiers often claim to be defending the Constitution. But they hypocritically proclaim they want to change the Constitution. As the self-proclaimed defenders of the Constitution, they really mean they want to defend only selected parts of it. They skip over the First Amendment, which creates the separation of church and state, because they believe the founding fathers would have wanted the commingling of religion and government. They conveniently ignore decades of legal precedent. They also ignore the fact that the founding fathers really did oppose the commingling of church and state, and that's precisely why they wrote the 1st Amendment! Teabaggers instead focus mostly on defending the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms because that one is supposedly under attack.
Republicans have said they don't like the 17th Amendment. They are against the election of U.S. Senators by the voters. That is a pretty Anti-American idea. They also want to change the 14th Amendment; specifically, they want to change the part that makes everyone who is born here a U.S. citizen. I think it is important to point out that this is the way that ALL natural born Americans became U.S. citizens. In other words, the vast majority of Republican Tea Partiers became citizens through the 14th Amendment - but they want to change it. How much more Anti-American can you get than to be against the Constitution? Read on.
Republicans in the Senate rail against the lack of job creation by the government, but have voted against every measure to create jobs. They voted against safeguards that would prevent our economy from crashing again. And they voted against making oil drilling off our coast safer. They vote against everything that is good for America. On every issue, Republicans have taken a hard-line Anti-American stance. They are willing to scuttle America for the sake of giving the wealthiest people in the world (not just Americans) an even greater portion of America's wealth. They block every effort by Democrats to build America up. Then they fill the media with their convoluted spin that somehow they are "doing America good."
The prevailing Republican attitude is "Either you give us all of the money and power, or we'll take America down!" Taking America hostage is as Anti-American you can get.
There are two kinds of people in America: those who want to take Obama down by taking America down, and those who want to build America up.
.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Conservative Political Activism On Supreme Court Threatens Democracy
The Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court is naked Conservative political activism which opens the floodgates for unlimited campaign funding by multi-national corporations. The judicial activism of the high court breaks down the last barrier which has held back for decades the disproportionate influence by the richest few over our democracy.
It turns American democracy into the same system that is used for shareholders who own stock in a company. In that system, you are able to "vote your shares", which means those who have the most dollars invested in the company get the most votes.
With unlimited amounts of money flowing into the political election process, elections and seats in government can be bought and sold like commodities. This is far different than what the founders created, a system that was "one man, one vote", not "one dollar, one vote".
The Conservative activism of the court created something that is simply not found anywhere in the Constitution. The hyper-reactionary court majority dominated by Roberts and Scalia have created a "self-destruct" button for our Democratic system. It changes America from a democracy to an aristocracy made up of the rich and the largest multinational corporations that drowns out the voices of 99% of Americans with unlimited political cash.
The court itself is dominated by the same political payback system that the rich and the Republican party have been cultivating for decades in both the executive and legislative branches.
Acting alone, the activism of the conservatives on the court would not succeed. Eventually the voters would check the radical power grab by the court. However, the conservative bias of the mainstream media, and the outright conservative propaganda of media such as FOX, ensures that American voters are left unaware of this threat to our democratic system of governance.
The Supreme Court's radical decisions also open American democracy to threats from other countries. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has been actively soliciting donations from foreign corporations and governments to fund attack ads against Democratic political candidates. These attack ads smear those candidates who fight the outsourcing of American jobs to those same countries that benefit from receiving the jobs. And the circle of money is completed.
The media is mute despite the polls that show over 80% of Americans are against outsourcing of jobs overseas. The mainstream media is adept at displaying it's strong conservative bias by poorly reporting, or not reporting at all, important populist issues - even issues that threaten to end our great American experiment in democracy.
The Citizens United decision makes the American voter the low bidder in the auctioning off of American democracy.
/
It turns American democracy into the same system that is used for shareholders who own stock in a company. In that system, you are able to "vote your shares", which means those who have the most dollars invested in the company get the most votes.
With unlimited amounts of money flowing into the political election process, elections and seats in government can be bought and sold like commodities. This is far different than what the founders created, a system that was "one man, one vote", not "one dollar, one vote".
The Conservative activism of the court created something that is simply not found anywhere in the Constitution. The hyper-reactionary court majority dominated by Roberts and Scalia have created a "self-destruct" button for our Democratic system. It changes America from a democracy to an aristocracy made up of the rich and the largest multinational corporations that drowns out the voices of 99% of Americans with unlimited political cash.
The court itself is dominated by the same political payback system that the rich and the Republican party have been cultivating for decades in both the executive and legislative branches.
Acting alone, the activism of the conservatives on the court would not succeed. Eventually the voters would check the radical power grab by the court. However, the conservative bias of the mainstream media, and the outright conservative propaganda of media such as FOX, ensures that American voters are left unaware of this threat to our democratic system of governance.
The Supreme Court's radical decisions also open American democracy to threats from other countries. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has been actively soliciting donations from foreign corporations and governments to fund attack ads against Democratic political candidates. These attack ads smear those candidates who fight the outsourcing of American jobs to those same countries that benefit from receiving the jobs. And the circle of money is completed.
The media is mute despite the polls that show over 80% of Americans are against outsourcing of jobs overseas. The mainstream media is adept at displaying it's strong conservative bias by poorly reporting, or not reporting at all, important populist issues - even issues that threaten to end our great American experiment in democracy.
The Citizens United decision makes the American voter the low bidder in the auctioning off of American democracy.
/
Friday, October 8, 2010
One Nation Rally Didn't Fit the Media's Narrative
Perspectives From The Ground
A lot has been said and written by those who obviously had no first hand knowledge of the event to share. As someone who was actually there, I decided to give a much needed accurate account.
The mainstream media was very conservative - and not just in its reporting. They all hid in one corner of the National Mall, on the North side near the stage. They seemed very condescending and not very interested in covering the event. They acted like they drew the short straw by getting the assignment to be there. I really don't think they did a very good job covering the event. They didn't go out into the crowd, and they left early.
Which means they missed a lot. One thing they missed was the energy and diversity of the crowd. They missed the positive attitude, the patriotism, the willingness to work to make America a better place for everyone. They missed it because they didn't want to contradict their narrative. It's fair to say the media was generally hostile toward the event.
One thing that is always brought up is how many people attended. So considering that I was actually there at the One Nation rally, and not seeing it through the filter of the "news", I can tell you it was a phenomenal turnout. It was packed!
An important point that the media missed completely when determining the turnout was that the crowd was fluid. Many participants had to leave while many others were still coming into the rally. The total number of people at any given moment was much smaller than the total number of people who actually participated throughout the day. Throngs of people streamed into the rally continuously throughout the late morning and afternoon. That means a snapshot of the crowd at noon did not get an accurate picture of the sheer volume of people who participated in the rally throughout the course of the day.
We also didn't have 2 of the richest Billionaires in the world underwriting our rally and providing free travel as was done with the Beck's "Distorting Honor" rally. The One Nation rally was supported by hard earned dollars from individual worker's paychecks. It was supported by real Americans, for real Americans.
How many unemployed people would you expect to have the money to travel across the country to rally in Washington DC? They are too busy looking for work, doing odd jobs, and trying to feed their families. How can we expect the poorest among us to protest what the Republicans have done to them, using what little of their own money the Republicans let them keep?
The mainstream media showed an incredible conservative bias in their reporting of the event. They weren't there to cover the news. They were only there to support their narrative.
When the media did bother to make a token effort, they asked if the rally was being unfriendly toward Republicans. The reply was "When Republicans work against the interests of the American people, we are against that. When Republicans use the government to make the richest among us even richer at the expense of the American workers, we are against that. When Republicans use racial and religious intolerance to divide us, we are against that. But this rally is not about dividing, it's about joining together. We encourage the Republicans to join us in making the economy stronger, in helping real Americans get decent jobs. We welcome the Republicans to join with us in making America strong again!"
Somehow the mainstream media failed to report that. It just didn't fit their narrative.
So if you hear that the One Nation march was not a big deal, you can know that you are listening to someone who wasn't actually there.
I was there. And it was a big deal. In the words of our Vice-President, it was a "BIG f-ing deal!"
A lot has been said and written by those who obviously had no first hand knowledge of the event to share. As someone who was actually there, I decided to give a much needed accurate account.
The mainstream media was very conservative - and not just in its reporting. They all hid in one corner of the National Mall, on the North side near the stage. They seemed very condescending and not very interested in covering the event. They acted like they drew the short straw by getting the assignment to be there. I really don't think they did a very good job covering the event. They didn't go out into the crowd, and they left early.
Which means they missed a lot. One thing they missed was the energy and diversity of the crowd. They missed the positive attitude, the patriotism, the willingness to work to make America a better place for everyone. They missed it because they didn't want to contradict their narrative. It's fair to say the media was generally hostile toward the event.
One thing that is always brought up is how many people attended. So considering that I was actually there at the One Nation rally, and not seeing it through the filter of the "news", I can tell you it was a phenomenal turnout. It was packed!
An important point that the media missed completely when determining the turnout was that the crowd was fluid. Many participants had to leave while many others were still coming into the rally. The total number of people at any given moment was much smaller than the total number of people who actually participated throughout the day. Throngs of people streamed into the rally continuously throughout the late morning and afternoon. That means a snapshot of the crowd at noon did not get an accurate picture of the sheer volume of people who participated in the rally throughout the course of the day.
We also didn't have 2 of the richest Billionaires in the world underwriting our rally and providing free travel as was done with the Beck's "Distorting Honor" rally. The One Nation rally was supported by hard earned dollars from individual worker's paychecks. It was supported by real Americans, for real Americans.
How many unemployed people would you expect to have the money to travel across the country to rally in Washington DC? They are too busy looking for work, doing odd jobs, and trying to feed their families. How can we expect the poorest among us to protest what the Republicans have done to them, using what little of their own money the Republicans let them keep?
The mainstream media showed an incredible conservative bias in their reporting of the event. They weren't there to cover the news. They were only there to support their narrative.
When the media did bother to make a token effort, they asked if the rally was being unfriendly toward Republicans. The reply was "When Republicans work against the interests of the American people, we are against that. When Republicans use the government to make the richest among us even richer at the expense of the American workers, we are against that. When Republicans use racial and religious intolerance to divide us, we are against that. But this rally is not about dividing, it's about joining together. We encourage the Republicans to join us in making the economy stronger, in helping real Americans get decent jobs. We welcome the Republicans to join with us in making America strong again!"
Somehow the mainstream media failed to report that. It just didn't fit their narrative.
So if you hear that the One Nation march was not a big deal, you can know that you are listening to someone who wasn't actually there.
I was there. And it was a big deal. In the words of our Vice-President, it was a "BIG f-ing deal!"
Friday, September 24, 2010
Republicans: Truth Seekers They Are Not
Have you ever wondered why it's so hard to get through to a right winger? Does it seem like the more wrong they are, the more closed-minded they become? For anyone who has ever tried to get through to a Republican, this article may help explain some of the frustrations felt by the thinking community.
The fundamental difference between Republicans and the thinking community is they have different goals. One side, for example, may want to reach an agreement on something that will make the world a better place. The other side just wants to win.
Average Republicans and Teabaggers (they are one in the same) are not interested in forming cogent arguments or in fact-based reasoning. Truth seekers they are not. Republicans don't want actual debate, they simply want to win the argument. They want to be the last one standing in a shouting match.
Their blind allegiance to FOX's propaganda channel is so they don't get exposed to information accidentally. Facts don't sit well with Republicans because facts don't further their agenda. Facts are the things that "evil Liberals" use to discredit Republicans; to them, facts are bad. Fortunately for Republicans, FOX has little to do with facts.
FOX does, however, provide a never ending litany of neo-conservative talking points, great sounding lies and sound bites that average Republicans need to shut down actual discussion and reasoning. Republicans watch FOX propaganda because it is useful. The FOX propaganda network provides the talking points Republicans need to obfuscate debate and make them impervious to reason.
A typical Republican technique is to accuse others of precisely that which they themselves are guilty. If you want to know what Republicans are up to, just see what they are accusing Democrats of doing. Are Republicans running up the deficit? Accuse Democrats of running up the deficit. Are the Republicans filibustering bills that help the economy? Accuse Democrats of stifling debate. And of hurting the economy.
It's that easy. Here, you try this one:
Republicans want to give tax breaks to the richest 1% and pay for it by increasing the deficit.
If you said "Democrats are driving up the deficit" good job. And if you added "Democrats are killing jobs" then you could be a Republican Senator!
The fundamental difference between Republicans and the thinking community is they have different goals. One side, for example, may want to reach an agreement on something that will make the world a better place. The other side just wants to win.
Average Republicans and Teabaggers (they are one in the same) are not interested in forming cogent arguments or in fact-based reasoning. Truth seekers they are not. Republicans don't want actual debate, they simply want to win the argument. They want to be the last one standing in a shouting match.
Their blind allegiance to FOX's propaganda channel is so they don't get exposed to information accidentally. Facts don't sit well with Republicans because facts don't further their agenda. Facts are the things that "evil Liberals" use to discredit Republicans; to them, facts are bad. Fortunately for Republicans, FOX has little to do with facts.
FOX does, however, provide a never ending litany of neo-conservative talking points, great sounding lies and sound bites that average Republicans need to shut down actual discussion and reasoning. Republicans watch FOX propaganda because it is useful. The FOX propaganda network provides the talking points Republicans need to obfuscate debate and make them impervious to reason.
A typical Republican technique is to accuse others of precisely that which they themselves are guilty. If you want to know what Republicans are up to, just see what they are accusing Democrats of doing. Are Republicans running up the deficit? Accuse Democrats of running up the deficit. Are the Republicans filibustering bills that help the economy? Accuse Democrats of stifling debate. And of hurting the economy.
It's that easy. Here, you try this one:
Republicans want to give tax breaks to the richest 1% and pay for it by increasing the deficit.
If you said "Democrats are driving up the deficit" good job. And if you added "Democrats are killing jobs" then you could be a Republican Senator!
Friday, September 17, 2010
Tea Party Taking On Role of Brown Shirts
The Tea Party is not as grassroots as we are led to believe. They are under the direction of the ultra-right wing lobbyist group ironically named "FreedomWorks" led by Dick Armey. Teabaggers get their marching orders and funding from Freedomworks, who in turn gets its money from corporations like Koch Industries. The money from Koch and other corporations is quietly funneled to organizations like Freedomsworks and Americans for Prosperity to stage what they would like us to believe are citizen protests. Through obfuscation, fear and intimidation, corporations and the secretive billionaire Koch brothers are determined to control public opinion on issues that might cause people to question their business practices.
The tactics of the tea party teabaggers is eerily similar to those of the Brown Shirts in the first half of the twentieth century during the rise of Nazism. For example, at the health care discussions by Congressman, Dick Armey and his henchmen were the ones responsible for training and organizing the hecklers whose only goal was to shout down debate and intimidate anyone who tried to express their own opinion. These mercenary 'protesters' are waging a war over the control of the public square.
Freedomworks Brown Shirt organizers gave specific instructions how to infiltrate a crowd to give the impression that your agents represent the majority, how to completely shout down all other people, and how to intimidate anyone who tried to disagree.
A recent video clip of tea party teabaggers screaming and verbally abusing an elderly man on the ground who had Parkinson's disease is a sickening but typical display of the sociopathic nature underlying the tea party Brown Shirts.
The sinister overlapping of neo-nazi groups, the KKK, and the tea party teabaggers is no accident. Freedomworks and the Americans for Prosperity actively cultivate and channel existing hate groups' activities toward its own political ends. The video shown below on this blog (Right Wing Crazies & Tea Party United Against Health Reform) shows how teabaggers and traditional racist groups are co-opting the anti-Obama campaign as a 'softer', more politically acceptable form of racism. The Koch brothers and other large corporations have hired Freedomworks to show these hate groups how to mask their outright racism and twist it into a more news-friendly 'political protest'. Watch the video and you can judge for yourself if it's working!
The tactics of the tea party teabaggers is eerily similar to those of the Brown Shirts in the first half of the twentieth century during the rise of Nazism. For example, at the health care discussions by Congressman, Dick Armey and his henchmen were the ones responsible for training and organizing the hecklers whose only goal was to shout down debate and intimidate anyone who tried to express their own opinion. These mercenary 'protesters' are waging a war over the control of the public square.
Freedomworks Brown Shirt organizers gave specific instructions how to infiltrate a crowd to give the impression that your agents represent the majority, how to completely shout down all other people, and how to intimidate anyone who tried to disagree.
A recent video clip of tea party teabaggers screaming and verbally abusing an elderly man on the ground who had Parkinson's disease is a sickening but typical display of the sociopathic nature underlying the tea party Brown Shirts.
The sinister overlapping of neo-nazi groups, the KKK, and the tea party teabaggers is no accident. Freedomworks and the Americans for Prosperity actively cultivate and channel existing hate groups' activities toward its own political ends. The video shown below on this blog (Right Wing Crazies & Tea Party United Against Health Reform) shows how teabaggers and traditional racist groups are co-opting the anti-Obama campaign as a 'softer', more politically acceptable form of racism. The Koch brothers and other large corporations have hired Freedomworks to show these hate groups how to mask their outright racism and twist it into a more news-friendly 'political protest'. Watch the video and you can judge for yourself if it's working!
In Lawsuit Against Carnahan, FOX Wins Either Way, and We Lose
Will FOX win its suit against Missouri Democratic Senate candidate Robin Carnahan for using video from FOX? Either way the suit goes, FOX wins.
FOX is not pursuing this case because they will make money from winning it; how much money could they possibly get? They are not doing this to protect their integrity; Mike Wallace and FOX have long ago given up any shred of integrity. Integrity is irrelevant to FOX’s mission to make money by distributing conservative propaganda.
Chilling Effect
Democracy requires that we know as much as we can about how candidates will govern if elected. The best argument against Republicans is their own words. The best attack ad against a Republican contains the actual statements showing the Republican's extremist views. And the best place to get that media is from FOX where Republicans feel free to express their extremist views.
If FOX wins their case, it would squelch campaign ads against Republicans using the choicest media from FOX that reveals Republican extremist views most clearly. Even if FOX loses, just the threat of a lawsuit by a big corporation against any campaign has a chilling effect on the media it uses in its ads.
That would shield Republican candidates from having their extremist views used against them. The last thing Republicans need is the media exposing what wing nuts they really are.
Winners and Winners
FOX actually would further it's propaganda mission if they lost the suit. As a manufacturer of propaganda, FOX knows it’s a lot easier to parse and clip video to make it look like it is saying something that it isn’t because the truth doesn’t fit their political agenda. FOX routinely hypes these fabricated stories. It is their bread and butter. For example, the Shirley Sherrod video clip was purposely edited to portray her as a racist, when actually the opposite was true. Her speech was really a triumph of tolerance over racism. But FOX pounced on it and played the maliciously edited clips relentlessly. Another example was the fake Acorn “scandal” where treacherous editing created a video that was entirely fictional. The controversies created, however, are real. We later find out we were duped when the truth is the opposite of what was shown.
This is exactly what they are accusing Carnahan of doing. FOX is employing a common Republican trick. Republicans routinely accuse others of precisely that which they themselves are guilty. FOX wants to prevent lawsuits against itself for doing exactly what it is suing Carnahan for allegedly doing.
FOX wins if it loses the case because the court will be saying it’s OK to parse, clip and edit someone’s words to totally distort what is actually said. They would have a court ruling that gives them permission to continue misrepresenting reality and continue manufacturing their propaganda without fear of legal recourse. FOX wants to prevent lawsuits against itself for routinely manipulating video and misrepresenting the truth on its network.
That’s why I want to see FOX win their suit. If they win they will have inadvertently set a standard that they will have to meet. They will have to abide by the decision that you can’t manipulate video and distort the truth.
Then what will FOX broadcast? News?
FOX is not pursuing this case because they will make money from winning it; how much money could they possibly get? They are not doing this to protect their integrity; Mike Wallace and FOX have long ago given up any shred of integrity. Integrity is irrelevant to FOX’s mission to make money by distributing conservative propaganda.
Chilling Effect
Democracy requires that we know as much as we can about how candidates will govern if elected. The best argument against Republicans is their own words. The best attack ad against a Republican contains the actual statements showing the Republican's extremist views. And the best place to get that media is from FOX where Republicans feel free to express their extremist views.
If FOX wins their case, it would squelch campaign ads against Republicans using the choicest media from FOX that reveals Republican extremist views most clearly. Even if FOX loses, just the threat of a lawsuit by a big corporation against any campaign has a chilling effect on the media it uses in its ads.
That would shield Republican candidates from having their extremist views used against them. The last thing Republicans need is the media exposing what wing nuts they really are.
Winners and Winners
FOX actually would further it's propaganda mission if they lost the suit. As a manufacturer of propaganda, FOX knows it’s a lot easier to parse and clip video to make it look like it is saying something that it isn’t because the truth doesn’t fit their political agenda. FOX routinely hypes these fabricated stories. It is their bread and butter. For example, the Shirley Sherrod video clip was purposely edited to portray her as a racist, when actually the opposite was true. Her speech was really a triumph of tolerance over racism. But FOX pounced on it and played the maliciously edited clips relentlessly. Another example was the fake Acorn “scandal” where treacherous editing created a video that was entirely fictional. The controversies created, however, are real. We later find out we were duped when the truth is the opposite of what was shown.
This is exactly what they are accusing Carnahan of doing. FOX is employing a common Republican trick. Republicans routinely accuse others of precisely that which they themselves are guilty. FOX wants to prevent lawsuits against itself for doing exactly what it is suing Carnahan for allegedly doing.
FOX wins if it loses the case because the court will be saying it’s OK to parse, clip and edit someone’s words to totally distort what is actually said. They would have a court ruling that gives them permission to continue misrepresenting reality and continue manufacturing their propaganda without fear of legal recourse. FOX wants to prevent lawsuits against itself for routinely manipulating video and misrepresenting the truth on its network.
That’s why I want to see FOX win their suit. If they win they will have inadvertently set a standard that they will have to meet. They will have to abide by the decision that you can’t manipulate video and distort the truth.
Then what will FOX broadcast? News?
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Newt Gingrich: Political Terrorist
Gingrich is a sociopath intent on being swept into power by inflaming the racists, bigots, and other right wing ideologues, even showing his willingness to use the same techniques employed by the nazi propaganda machine.
The parallels are clear. He foments distrust of races other than white. He questions the legitimacy of the democratically elected government, and says that our elected President is not one of us because he is black and has an African tribal mentality.
Gingrich disseminates the propaganda that first our government, and now our nation, has been taken over by extremists, even though the government was freely elected by the majority of the voters who make up our great nation. He is claiming that the institution of democracy itself has somehow failed, and that he actually sees himself as the "savior" of the nation. So when he says he wants a "revolution", he really means it, and he is using political terrorism to achieve it.
Gingrich is spewing hateful propaganda vilifying the Muslims in the same way that the nazis vilified the Jews with their propaganda in the years leading up to World War II.
From the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he generalizes that Islam is in a holy war against us, and that we must fight back against all Muslims or perish. His anti-religious propaganda targets American citizens who happen to practice a different faith than he does. He wrongly equates Christianity with patriotism and cites "the founding fathers", despite the fact that the founding fathers explicitly enshrined the freedom of religion, and the separation of the government from religion in the Constitution. In the case of the Muslim community center in New York, Gingrich actually believes that the first 16 words of the First Amendment of our Constitution do not apply to Americans when they are of a different religion than his.
His movie "America at Risk: The War With No Name" shows a radical and absurd portrayal of Islam, and his "final solution" is a radical and absurd takeover of secular government by Christian religion.
All of Gingrich's hateful rhetoric is directed at extremists who he hopes will see him as their leader. He hopes to channel the anger he has created into a violent rage and push America one goose-step closer to fascism. He knows from history that by employing intimidation techniques with the real threat of violence, a small group of extremists can have a disproportionate and corrosive effect on political discourse. By harnessing all of the weaknesses of character of marginal Americans, he carries out his acts of political terrorism with the complicity of the media.
We should not fear Gingrich; we should expose him. We need to remain vigilant, and see him as an example of everything that America isn't.
It is my hope that by exposing Gingrich's political terrorism, the great American democratic ideals and the better judgment of the vast majority of Americans will prevail.
The parallels are clear. He foments distrust of races other than white. He questions the legitimacy of the democratically elected government, and says that our elected President is not one of us because he is black and has an African tribal mentality.
Gingrich disseminates the propaganda that first our government, and now our nation, has been taken over by extremists, even though the government was freely elected by the majority of the voters who make up our great nation. He is claiming that the institution of democracy itself has somehow failed, and that he actually sees himself as the "savior" of the nation. So when he says he wants a "revolution", he really means it, and he is using political terrorism to achieve it.
Gingrich is spewing hateful propaganda vilifying the Muslims in the same way that the nazis vilified the Jews with their propaganda in the years leading up to World War II.
From the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he generalizes that Islam is in a holy war against us, and that we must fight back against all Muslims or perish. His anti-religious propaganda targets American citizens who happen to practice a different faith than he does. He wrongly equates Christianity with patriotism and cites "the founding fathers", despite the fact that the founding fathers explicitly enshrined the freedom of religion, and the separation of the government from religion in the Constitution. In the case of the Muslim community center in New York, Gingrich actually believes that the first 16 words of the First Amendment of our Constitution do not apply to Americans when they are of a different religion than his.
His movie "America at Risk: The War With No Name" shows a radical and absurd portrayal of Islam, and his "final solution" is a radical and absurd takeover of secular government by Christian religion.
All of Gingrich's hateful rhetoric is directed at extremists who he hopes will see him as their leader. He hopes to channel the anger he has created into a violent rage and push America one goose-step closer to fascism. He knows from history that by employing intimidation techniques with the real threat of violence, a small group of extremists can have a disproportionate and corrosive effect on political discourse. By harnessing all of the weaknesses of character of marginal Americans, he carries out his acts of political terrorism with the complicity of the media.
We should not fear Gingrich; we should expose him. We need to remain vigilant, and see him as an example of everything that America isn't.
It is my hope that by exposing Gingrich's political terrorism, the great American democratic ideals and the better judgment of the vast majority of Americans will prevail.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
